An Iconic Fantasy Baseball Community
Moderator: Baseball Moderators
JDD wrote:I love Gammons, when he reports what other people say.
And if he spent any time with the Reds, he would have learned that Kearns may not even win a job this spring.
mcmahojl wrote:Jeremy Bonderman. Ignore the won-loss, the raw numbers are very good and the stuff is better. Remember, he should be a college junior.
Gammons does have some bizarre predictions. I dont think Bonderman is ready just yet. Even if you "ignore the won-loss" his numbers still are not that good. He did have a few good games, but I put him in the "Ill let you worry about him" category.
Bonderman had an excellent 2nd half and much of his first half ERA was due to some fluke runs, bad defense etc. I think hes going to emerge as the ace of that young staff.
Mookie4ever wrote:wow. I disagree with almost every single one of those except for Utley.
stumpak wrote:Gammons makes a lot of foolish statements whenever he enters the realm of analysis. He is a great journalist in the sense of having a huge network of contacts and getting the scoop, but once things get beyond that he is very limited. Beyond that, he is actually a poor writer from a stylistic perspective and has trouble clearly communicating his point. I wouldn't hire someone who turned in a writing sample as garbled and unclear as some Gammon's more meandering points.
CubsFan7724 wrote:Man, the Yankee fans on this board hate Gammons so much. Did he steal your bikes when you were kids or something?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests