I see zero reason to veto this trade. It's fair, it's not a rip-off, and the rest of the situation doesn't matter. All that matters is the players involved. Sad that something so fair would be vetoed just because other owners think one manager isn't active enough.
I've won fantasy leagues with zero roster moves for the year. Would that classify me as an "inactive" manager? Not in the least. I just have had a couple of drafts in my lifetime that I could not have scripted any better. Now I understand the "inactive" owner in this case has no shot, but it's a fair trade and cannot be vetoed just because the rest of the league wants to be prejudiced against the "inactive" owner, or the owner trading with him.
Yes doctor, I am sick.
Sick of those who are spineless.
Sick of those who feel self-entitled.
Sick of those who are hypocrites.
Yes doctor, an army is forming.
Yes doctor, there will be a war.
Yes doctor, there will be blood.....