i think vetoing that deal was idiotic, who gave ur commish the job? as expressed in this forum many a time, veoting trades should be strictly used when collusion is obvious. if the last place guy give the first place guy soriano for uribe, thats evident collusion, when 2 ppl are likely cheating. someone on another thread put it best the other day.... if theres no collusion, let the adults make their own decisions. i think ur commish is on a power trip b/c theres no way a trade like that should be vetoed.