BobbyRoberto wrote:To Zito is God: Are you kidding me? From someone who thinks Barry Zito (3-3, 5.63 ERA, 1.58 WHIP) is God, how can you rip on Santana (2-1, 4.70, 1.37)? He's pitched better than Zito. Santana's also pitched 7 innings in 3 of his last 5 starts (which Zito hasn't). He had a 2.99 ERA in 2002 and a 3.07 ERA in 2003. Was he lucky for 2 years? Santana will be fine. He's already doing much better in May (3.86 ERA) than he did in April (5.40). He's striking 8 guys per 9 innings. The biggest difference he's facing so far is hits on balls in play, which is a reflection of the defense to some degree.
Why don't you read the quesion asked first before throwing your .02 in. I NEVER stated anything about Zito in my topic, not whether he was better or worse (although I think this one is obvious). I have no idea why you are giving me comparison of Zito's and santana's stats when this thread ain't about Zito at all, I never even stated who was better or worse this year. People have good years, then bad years. I can make the same arguement saying that about 8 years ago Appier was dominant (for 2 or more years) so therefore all of you should pikc him up. I don't care what he DID, I care about what he is DOING. With your arguement I can make the same case for Zito. Well, Zito won the Cy Young 2 years ago and that can't be luck so everyone should go and trade for him now. (This is not my arguement, justr giving an example of how your arguement makes no sense.)
For future notice, know what the topic is about before posting please...
Sean Tracey has my apologies, we all know Ozzie Guillen is an idiot. I'm rooting for you!