An Iconic Fantasy Baseball Community
Moderator: Baseball Moderators
ironman wrote:People seem to fall on one side of the fence or the other on this issue. Majority of my leagues are Yahoo H2H leagues, which I prefer. I do agree there is some luck involved but to say that there is no strategy to it I find to be far from the truth.
Having ran my own leagues on Yahoo H2H for going on my 4th year I have to say I don't think its a total coincidence that I get the same managers near the top of the standings and the same at the bottom. However I do think that luck can play a big factor in the playoffs as I have seen dominate first place managers go down in the first round all too often. In a way I think that being a regular season champ in a Yahoo H2H holds more honor and glory than winning the playoffs
This more of just a rambling thread for people's thoughts on this than anything. I just thought it would be interesting to hear people's arguments for or againts H2H leagues. Is Yahoo's H2H style (a weird weekly roto type scoring) better than a H2H-points style scoring? IMO I find H2H to be more exciting come the second half of a season just for the fact that in most roto leagues I play the standings are pretty well settled at that point with very few shifts in the standings. My favorite way to describe Yahoo H2H is that its like roto-style baseball for people with ADD.
So anyway whether you're a H2H freak, or a Roto-purist, feel free to drop your $0.02 on the subject.
great gretzky wrote:
I really wish there could be a head to head element to roto. like have a five by five by one. The one being best record in head to head matchups.
only problem is I don't knwo how to really implement it.
it hink it could keep the other owners interested.
We also thought about doing a mirror league to see the differences. Like everyteam is duplicated from roto to head to head, and mvoes made in roto are mirrored in the other. I wonder what the differences would be.
Users browsing this forum: Yahoo [Bot] and 7 guests