jasonpm311 wrote:Thanks for doing that. It obviously makes it a lot clearer when you take out those two. I'm REALLY confused, though. Why is everyone so high on Lawrie?? The guy didn't do a damn thing last year! What am I missing?
We love guys who aren't stars yet but could become a star soon. He might not do it but he has enough tools that if it all comes together it will be special. He can be a 20/20 guy at 3B with solid RBI/R/AVG numbers and could get his HR to 30+.
If in set 2, you were talking about a 3B with a better track record than EE, I would probably go with him over Lawrie. But both have some question marks and I would rather have Hamels and Lawrie then EE and Dickey.