An Iconic Fantasy Baseball Community
Moderator: Baseball Moderators
Bloody Sox wrote:LOVE the Top 50 list - great job to all involved.
One question though: why leave off DL guys? In some ways I think they are the most important ones to have on the list so you can judge their value.
Keeping with the question "would I trade player X for player Y for the rest of this season?", that still very much applies to the DL guys. I for one know that I'd love to see where people think Longoria and Halladay fall in terms of value.
Just my opinion - thanks for the time and effort. Maybe I'll make a stab at my own Top 50 to submit for the next round.
WaCougMBS wrote:Element wrote:I agree. I processed my list with the DL'd guys on it. They still carry value.
Makes sense - I think I'll include them in my list next week too. Especially since I hit a wall around 46 where I would have rather sprinkled most of them in to fill out the top 50. It is tougher, but I think it's a must as the next step in the process
jfg wrote:I've been including DL guys. It makes sense as long as you downgrade them depending how long they are out.
What I'm more concerned about is how the site rankings are being used. As far as I can tell all of those rankings are just stat based, not projection based. Nobody from those sites are doing projections, they are just listing them in the order they are performing in each sites league. I guess I don't understand the purpose of including those rankings in a Cafe ranking list. As far as I can tell, we want these rankings to be a perception of how we feel about these players going forward. Including those rankings seems to contradict that. Plus, those three sites are going to be pretty similar across the board since it's just based off the season until now. So a guy like Pujols can finish top 10 in all of our rankings, but he gets three 51 rankings from the big sites. It's up to you, but I personally think we should discontinue using those rankings.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 16 guests