So I am in a league, and earlier in the year my LM and I had an agreement that we would have two LM and we would review eachother's trades after he had some trades that heavily benefited his side and should have been vetoed, that way nobody has to review their own, and has a bias that there trade is fair bc they want it to go through, so after i vetoed a trade of his, he deleted me as he was the head LM, later he agreed to add me back after he admitted the trade was unfair, later he had a trade that i APPROVED, the kid in the trade who is not the LM (who doesn't like me for whatever reason) convinced him to delete me as LM, i argued with him to add me back, he would not but said this in a FB chat:
i dont get why ur making a big deal of u being LM
bc when i haven't been u have cheated
July 15 My LM
ok so u can see the trades i do
and if u think they r unfair then i can send them back
now he is saying he is close to a deal for granderson and tulowitzki, he hasn't told me exaclty what the deal is yet but he has told me that pretty much all of his best players aernt in it, i have confronted him about it and brought up what he said in this chat, he said he doesn't remember it and he has final say for his trades
A) Shouldn't i be able to have this power that he agreed too?
B) does this seem like the following could be collusion?
the team he is trying to trade with is in 5th place, 4 teams make the playoffs, this is the last matchup b4 the playoffs which ends tmrw, he is currently winning 9-4-2 in categories, he needs 11 wins to tie the 4th place team, and he would win the tiebreaker if he does
so this team needs to win right now to make the playoffs, my LM has been trying to reyes youk ricky weeks and hanley who all return next week, if he traded for these guys and gave up two of his best players wouldn't that seem like its collusion
I will be glad to help in return