lol.cs3 wrote:huh? who is "this women" you are talking about? i never mentioned anything about a specific case.wrveres wrote:but you are not right.clearly this women, no matter what you think of her, and your opinion of her is pretty clear, deserves half of their martial assets. They built their wealth together. This is not Anna Nicole Smith banging some old guy for cash. This is a husband and wife, legally separating, and she is entitled to 1/2 the marital assets cus they built those assets together.
SpecialFNK wrote:Dodgers filling for bankruptcy. I kind of feel sorry for McCourt, but then I admit I don't know the entire story/situation. I wouldn't be surprised if his wife/ex wife will make out pretty damn good, these bitches always do. it's a shame really that when couples get divorced the woman gets half the man's stuff.
then of course you went on some tangent telling the world to prove you wrong. Which i'll just go ahead and pass on. You research it. Its apparent you havent.cs3 wrote:it might sound bad but i agree with FNK. its not ignorant at all. in many cases its pretty much true.
it did crack me up though that you tried to pretend you didn't know "what woman" we are talking about here ...