WaCougMBS wrote:DaShiz23 wrote:lastingsgriller wrote:But there is something else i want to point out here. and it's Wake. Wake is coming off as a very practiced, savvy player here. and even has lebowski saying we should doctor him up every other rd... I would agree the wake appears to be savvy. but also savvy enough for a mafia member to lay some serious townie-like groundwork in this early statge in the game. could it be that he brought up a somewhat flawed plan so he could point out reasons why a mafia member would never bring it up? I don't see this as an impossibility at all.
I am not saying that Wake is mafia.. but if we go through with executing m16A and he turns out to be innocent, I think this topic may need to be revisited.
I completely agree with this line of thought here. I was really hoping to hear some of our quiet competitors here, but this doesn't seem to be happening. I am not one to vote for someone because of silence at this point.
For awhile here I have had this vote in mind, and nothing has been said to persuade me otherwise.
This post is a bit confusing to me - "I agree completely with someone who spoke out against wake and voted for m16, so therefore I vote for Inuk"...wait, what? I know you think Iunk made a crazy misstep and many (including me) have given credence to that line of reasoning, but how do you agree with someone's reasoning that led them to a silent guy who voted once and then disappeared for over a day and then use that as logic to vote for someone you've "had in mind" but said nothing about?
Unless he is trying to get the heat off of m16 and get the ball rolling on Inuck. I'm confused now, so you are spared for the moment Inuk. A nice middle of the road vote from a mafia to a townie that is gaining steam