oddmanout7 wrote:The list needs to be tweaked, but I thought for sure I would get better responses than being laughed at.
I think a list like this needs to be done in tiers. I mean, there's nothing objective one can point to in a list of 30 guys of different ages, in different leagues, playing against different competition, none of whom are expected to be at potential within the next couple of years.
This is the reason people say they are 'laughing' - bc they have nothing objective to disagree with. So they throw a dumb comment on it without discussion.
I agree that tiers are preferred. I didn't/don't have the time so i just try to rank them. Its so hard because I can easily move a guy up or down a few spots. Also I think my list is biased towards those in the majors as more data is available on them, and I have also seen them play, where I have only watch some vids on a few of the prospects.
Perhaps you could throw together some tiered ranks?