An Iconic Fantasy Baseball Community
Moderator: Baseball Moderators
MTUCache wrote:League setups and strategies like this are why I don't think I've ever had a positive experience playing H2H. It's way too easy to punt one category or type of player and not be penalized for it.
Ender wrote:H2H and daily transactions don't mix all that well, I'd push for the league to go weekly and that works much much better.
If you are used to H2H and are in an active league where you can have some fun trash talking with your opponent you'll find a move to roto very boring. The two don't compare at all. I always play my one H2H league with friends and it is by far the most fun league I've been in but I play roto for my money leagues since it is a better game from a technical standpoint.
Bogey9906 wrote:My H2H league with daily transactions works great. We use a yearly limit on transactions to eliminate streaming. Our limit is too low at 20 per year, but around 50 would be fine (or 3 per week). Also, a minimum of 40 IP per week puts a premium on starting pitching in the draft, so there's nobody good left to stream.
We also split the payout to include leaders in cumulative Roto-style stats, in addition to payouts for weekly winners, final standings and playoff winners. Recognizing cumulative Roto stats seems to keep people from consistently punting the same category each week. Splitting the payout also helps reduce the emphasis on fickle H2H playoffs, which is the biggest negative to H2H. This way, the best team usually wins the biggest payout overall, but bragging rights still go to the playoffs winner.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 7 guests