fezzik wrote:Fade2White12 wrote:I'm not saying to abolish the 4 year rule or to allow you to keep a bunch of guys. I just think the league would benefit by not having a complete flood of players hitting the league at one time. If you knew that you could possibly protect 1-2 guys for longer than 4 years, would you have altered your draft strategy? I wouldn't have.
No, I wouldn't have. That definitely sounds like something to consider, but you said "handful"...so you can't blame me for thinking 4-6. Maybe I just have bigger hands than you.
I guess you're right, since I did say handful. But I guess I can blame you for not reading the second half of that statement where I gave an actual number - 1+. When I say 1+, you think half a dozen?
And I have hands like tennis rackets.