An Iconic Fantasy Baseball Community
Moderator: Baseball Moderators
teddy ballgame wrote:Your reaction to the votes hasn't helped your case at all. Instead of addressing the points I brought up you've just tried to turn it back around against me and WaCoug to deflect suspicion.
teddy ballgame wrote:Normally, I would be suspicious of Dan at this point.
First, this post:Dan Lambskin wrote:
if i was Mafia i'd kill you first just for being a douche
Not because he said "if I was mafia," but because it instantly makes GF a target for the mafia at night. If Dan's not mafia, they might kill GF to make him look suspicious. If Dan is mafia, he could have said that to then kill GF and make it look like the mafia set him up.
teddy ballgame wrote:Then this:Dan Lambskin wrote:
uh oh...i hope that doesnt mean you plan to kill me at night...hopefully the Doctor will save me
A nonchalant way of asking for protection tonight. If he is mafia, it would ensure whoever he wants to kill doesn't get protected.
So normally I would be very suspicious, but I'm willing to give him the benefit of the doubt in these being rookie blunders...for now.
teddy ballgame wrote:J's post just alerted me to something else. Dan placed the third vote on buffalo with weak reasoning IMO. It was more like hopping on the bandwagon. I said I would let his actions slide as rookie blunders at the moment, but I have 3 legitimate reasons to suspect him at this point, which is more than I can say about anyone else.
Vote: Dan Lambskin
Dan Lambskin wrote:i really think you're grasping at straws...i'm known as a joker on these boards (hence the jester icon)...
AussieDodger wrote:Dan Lambskin wrote:i really think you're grasping at straws...i'm known as a joker on these boards (hence the jester icon)...
I'm sorry, would you like to point out which one it is? I don't see it under your avatar.
WaCougMBS wrote:urbanbreez wrote:WaCougMBS wrote:I'm guessing not looking at your role is just a ploy of some sort, but in the interests of stirring the pot and seeing if this will cause you to check...
There was a lot of I want this and I want that in BBRs post. Could be a mob boss. We better take him out just to be sure.
Well, taking people out just to be sure can only really be done once or twice before the bad guys take it down, so be sure you want to have that avalanche before taking it past the point of no return
buffalobillsrul2002 wrote:teddy ballgame wrote:I had never considered not looking at my role, but I kind of like that idea, buffalo. It would certainly make Day 1 more interesting.
It certainly does make the first part of the day interesting, when we're just talking. Now it akes it even more interesting, because I'm trying to figure out why the votes being cast on me are cast (do they think I'm evil Mafia, or do they think I'm a good townie).WaCougMBS wrote:[
It certainly would make it more interesting (on day 1 at least) on an individual level, but in general I think it just makes you throw out a bunch of meaningless bunk and pile onto the accusations and possibly die an early death (which could happen to anyone, but I'm just sayin'). At this point, it's always interesting to consider those who are silent for this long, as they've likely checked their roles but haven't made it over here for various reasons...
Darnit, you're sort of onto me WaCoug. I'll explain further at the appropriate time ;-7 (sort of like Jason Giambi, though I don't remember him every explaining why he roided). Though dieing an early death isn't really what I'm looking to do haha.. though it's looking like that might happen
And with that vote by AussieDodger, it's time to look at my role.
Hmm.. interesting. And as soon as I saw my role, I knew who to vote for.
Aussie, you've made 3 posts, one of them which was to vote for me. That makes me angry. And since I can't pile on to the accusations of myself, I'm gonna play contrarian and start a new one.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 4 guests