Madison wrote: fezzik wrote:
Madison wrote:Now if that writeup is attempting to say they didn't sleep together, then I agree the courts will have to figure out if they did or not.
I felt this was the clear implication. If they slept together, then...
But it didn't say that. I figured for sure there would be a "they didn't sleep together!" line in there somewhere, but there wasn't.
I realize that. I assume you know what the word "implication" means, so I'll avoid being a smartass...just this once at least.
If they had sex, of course there doesn't exist any sort of reasonable excuse...so what exactly are you taking exception to? I will happily stand behind my previous statements that the implication was clear, the article was completely biased/one-sided, and that more facts need to come out before we should be passing judgment.
If she's guilty I hope she gets prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.