Wright2Reyes wrote:Art Vandelay wrote:BitterDodgerFan wrote:ugh if they're gonna list names, list everyone's names from the list, not singling people out.
Who are "they," though? It's not as if MLB is releasing these names. If the New York Times had more names, they'd release them. Do you think MLB should release all of the names because a couple have leaked?
2 names have been leaked already, the damage has been done, its going to be better if its done all at once than one name every couple of months.
I'm sure the other 102 guys on that list don't feel this way, especially considering they were tested for purposes of creating the current policies in place, and told their names would never be made public under any circumstance.