CruiseJD wrote:No collusion, but Team 1 owner is not a serious player. I'll post rosters later this morning.
i have this problem in one of my leagues....and it has made me rethink my only veto on collusion stand point
my cousin plays in our friends league(not serious) just for teh hell of it. he doesnt really know that much or research that much...or check his team too much. he basically does just enough to get by
when it comes to trading...he will accept almost anything with the response of "what the hell...why not...i really dont care anyways"
i actually got this response from him once. since then its become basically an automatic veto from the league and would be from me if commish veto only anytime he accepts a trade. i wish people would stop offering him stuff so we could stop vetoing...but id hate to tell everyone to do that...as its friendly
so in these type cases...i have been swayed to thinking vetoing is the way to go...even though no collusion exists
and yes, that trade is freaking horrible