An Iconic Fantasy Baseball Community
Moderator: Baseball Moderators
shawngee03 wrote:60 or 80 works fine. 40 would also work and be a little closer to what you are wanting to do. w a 25 or 26 week season, you see how even 80 would not allow too much streaming(80/25=3.something). you can also limit transactions per week(i know yahoo has this now), to accomplish what you are wanting w/o limiting total yearly totals
or you can do net QS instead of QS to limit streaming
and i must add, adding IP and QS really reduces the value of RP. you just added 2 SP cats w/o adding a RP cat. i would think about that(my suggestion would to remove Ip and add holds as i like holds, but thats just me)
evilempire2 wrote:JTWood wrote:10 isn't bad for a contract league, since you're committed to those players.
I'd say 25 would be appropriate for a redraft league.
does 25 moves, with a limit of 3 per week sound reasonable?
or better yet unlimited moves with a limit on the # per week?
JTWood wrote:MRs are even more erratic and unpredictable than closers.
I don't believe you'd ever be able to justify taking them that early.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 2 guests