DSheppard wrote:Why does it have to be collusion for noone to sign bonds? The guy faces federal charges.
I've written and erased 6 different retorts to this, but I've decided that it wasn't worth the effort.
Ah, yet you posted anyway. This way you get to imply your crushing argument without giving me anything to reply to. Wheres the applause smily?
So what exactly do you think happened here. All the owners called each other up and actually said "I won't sign bonds if you don't"?
I just can't see it happening in this age without anyone actually finding out (rather than just speculating). Well, its not impossible at least, I'll say that. Do you think its 100% that it IS what happened? Not even a chance the owners viewed the PR and other issues that come with bonds that highly?