i dont know about yahoo, but if this trade was made in my cbs pay league, I WOULD DEFINITELY VETO. when i got money on the line, i dont like unfair deals. i pretty much agree with the post calling hunter a late-round scrub and analyzing the deal as kent for manny. im willing to guess that the guy wanting manny made the initial offer, not the other way around. when i get a deal like this, i first look at the overall talent. it seems to be quite one-sided here. then i will look at the teams. of course, if the deal somehow helps my team out, that is, manny is being traded from a team more dangerous to me to a lesser team, then i MIGHT approve. but most likely, a trade like this involves a better fantasy owner trying to take advantage of an owner who isnt as good. and more likely that not, the guy who would be getting manny has a good team to begin with since he is tryin to pull off the coup. with the money on the line, i would no doubt VETO this trade.
btw, i dont veto them all. earlier this month, cameron santana and mota were traded for lee gordon and r. soriano. i had no problems approving this deal.
its often the 2 for 1 deals that you are most suspicious about. decent player + plus scrub = great player??? i dont think so.