Neato Torpedo wrote: wrveres wrote:
wrveres wrote:todays scientist's can't explain the Pyramids. They only have theory's.
Neato wrote:I scored a 33 on the reading portion of the ACT ... Also, scientists do have many possible models describing how the pyramids were built.
That's a historian's problem, dude. We know that one of those models is right, but records kept on hardened mud tend to disintegrate.Verdict: not guilty, but a mistrial is declared due to prosecution's incompetence.
Bring back Yoda!
you don't get to decide your own verdict you fool.
what world do you live in? it's why you have peers.
So in closing. i charge neato lacks reading comprehension. he clearly repeated what i said, just not as witty. he clearly thought i said scientists 2500 years ago were smarter than today, when i said nothing like that. i even went out of my way to highlight the very words that said so ... Neato's only defense was he did well on a test that has been dummied down to get as many passing scores as possible. Not to mention, mummy and daddy probably paid for one or two "practice" reading comprehension tests prior to the official one. As my peers, you have no choice but to find the defendant .. guilty.