An Iconic Fantasy Baseball Community
Moderator: Baseball Moderators
A wise man wrote:If it's obviously collusion, then veto the trade. Otherwise, let it slide.
After all, value is a relative term, and attempting to standardize it is an exercise in futility.
hot4tx wrote:Also here's a good argument for it being ok to veto trades that are extremely lopsided even if you don't think there's collusion involved...
Broncmet724 wrote:The problem with vetos is that different people value different players differently.
hot4tx wrote:I extremely rarely even think about or discuss a veto even when I think one team is getting a steal, but that still doesn't rule out any possibility that there may be a situation where veto is called for where there is no collusion.
Users browsing this forum: Claudeol and 1 guest