An Iconic Fantasy Baseball Community
Moderator: Baseball Moderators
wildbill wrote:AllDay wrote:I don't have anything against the 'Stro's, Ed Wade, or Michael Bourn - and I think it is silly to promote the theory that a player is destined for failure simply because some GM has given him cooties.
Dude, seriously, you need to stop posting when you've come back from the bar so drunk you're ready to pass out because you just aren't making any sense. I don't think anyone is going to think you dislike Ed Wade. If anything you sound like you're ready to bear Ed Wade's love child.
At any rate like I said Ed Wade's record with trades while he was the Phillies GM was extremely poor. It seems foolish to think that will suddenly change just because he's the GM of a new club. Also the reason the Phillies traded Bourn is they, and most people familiar with him at the time, only saw Bourn as a 4th OF. Basically I'm saying given those facts, the deck is stacked against Bourn becoming the superstar you seem to think he is. Might he surprise everyone an perform far better then expected? Anything is possible, but it's not the most likely scenario.
AllDay wrote:Did I say MIchael Bourn was a superstar?
AllDay wrote:Maybe you should put your crack pipe down for a few seconds and let your head clear a little before you jump on the internet.
AllDay wrote:Your evaluation of the player is overshadowed by your desire to play 7 degrees of Ed Wade.
AllDay wrote:If that is how you evaluate players, fine - but others shouldn't use your misguided Ed Wade rants to make their own roster decisions.
AllDay wrote:If you need some steals he is an excellent source of steals.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests