Rhydderch wrote:Mines not baseball either, but I played in a hockey sorta money league (10 bucks) where, after about 1 month, the first place guy traded his entire team to the last place guy. The idea of vetoing came in, but the guy made a logical argument.
If you're not joking, please explain that "logical argument"...
If they swapped teams it wouldn't change the rosters in the league. The guy in first was probably there because of a combination of luck and skill. The guy in last was probably there because of a combination of back luck and a lack of skill...if they swapped rosters, then the better manager would be working with a last place team...perhaps because he wants to bring the last place team to first to show his utter dominance or something...that last place guy gets the better team, but will most likely manage it with less skill than the previous manager...allowing for every other manager in the league not involved in the trade to improve. That being said it would piss me off to no end...I want to compete against the best fantasy managers, and that sort of self-imposed handicap would take all the satisfaction out of the league for me.
If he just meant one guy traded his entire roster for one guy...then I really can't imagine a logical argument unless the last place team only had one guy on his entire roster.