An Iconic Fantasy Baseball Community
Moderator: Baseball Moderators
BritSox wrote:It was a terrorist act. Therefore, whoever perpetrated it is by definition a terrorist. Not seeing the problem here.
knapplc wrote:The person asking the original question was just trying to cause trouble. The rest of us all saw reality.
Art Vandelay wrote:knapplc wrote:The person asking the original question was just trying to cause trouble. The rest of us all saw reality.
Don't you get tired of saying this about me? This must be the 5th or 6th time you've made such an accusation...it's tiresome. It is possible to look to engage someone in a discussion without "trying to cause trouble," whatever that even means.
From reading STL's post, it would seem that he was saying it was an act perpetrated by a person, persons, who had a history of terrorist activities, or a connection to groups with a history of terrorist activities. I found it odd that he would be able to make such a claim before any authorities even mentioned possible suspects or terrorist connections.
knapplc wrote:Don't be coy. It's obvious what you were asking and why. Your track record shows a history of these kinds of leading questions. It would be an assumption on my part had you never asked such a question, only to jump into some rant about this or that in the past. Since you've done so (and apparently continue to do so) it's no longer an assumption.
Users browsing this forum: Danielrit and 2 guests