Thanks for the tips...Dave Bush had well over a 4.00 ERA the past two years, though 2005 was apparently injury claden. That's why I say he's "unproven", though he did have a 3.69 ERA in 16 starts in 2004. Right now Rich Hill is ranked much higher than both of them on Yahoo, but that obviously doesn't say much. ESPN has Bush being one of the best pitchers in the ML this year. Sanchez, yeah, might not have as good of a year but with the year he had last year he is the safer choice, as you said, above Hill.