It's our league's first year and we already have our first big debate. The issue at hand is positional eligibility. At our draft, we foolishly passed a vote that allowed some players to have special eligibilty at certain positions (i.e, Phelps and Fick at catcher) without looking into and examining it. We hastily voted yes although I wanted to investigate before we voted but it passed anyhow.
Now that Yahoo is out and both Fick and Phelps are not catcher eligible, but we "voted" that they were, the Commish is allowing it. Both owners are throwing it in our faces that they got their way and are using the "we already voted" excuse for their reasoning but I just filed for a re-vote.
I guess what I'm getting at is this: Am I wrong for just thinking that whatever Yahoo determines a player's position to be, THAT'S what it should be, period? Phelps and Fick didn't play a game at catcher last year yet they're going to be eligible there in our league and that doesn't seem fair to me.