BeanTown wrote:In the past Ironman's rankings have been an average of a # of websites all put together. From the looks of the new site it looks like a different route may have been taken.
Are these your own rankings or a composite of a number of sources like previous years?
For the most part yes. I've done a little of my own tweaking to it, but it's basically a compiled cheat sheet again. Unlike previous years though, I'm not going to do the average ranking or standard deviation. I just don't have the time to mess with publishing all that.