mweir145 wrote:Mookie4ever wrote:You two amuse me like Koko B. Ware amused Andre the Giant, like the Philly secondary amused Larry Fitzgerald, like the Bruins amuse the Canadiens.
The Bruins are way better than the Canadiens. They've beaten them 3 times this year, I believe, including once last week.
You make a post like this:
mweir145 wrote:It will be Baltimore and Philly in the Super Bowl. And I don't think the Eagles will have any problem at all with Arizona.
and still you chirp?
What is it in your chemical make up that requires you to come back for more? Please sign your donor card so that when the day comes (and it will) that you chirp at the wrong guy in a bar, science can open up your head to find out what causes this malignant case of Darcy Tucker that you have.
wrt the Bruins/Canadiens - the Habs have won 24 Stanley Cups - that's more than a quarter of all of the Stanley Cups ever won. The Bruins have won 5. So they are ok right now. In truth they are an abysmal franchise. In the last nine seasons they have either not made the playoffs or have been eliminated by the Habs (except for 03 when the Devils had the honour). The Bruins have not been to the finals since 1990 and have not won since 1972 - the Habs have won 7 Cups since then. The Habs are the superior franchise, always have been. The Habs are the class of the NHL, always have been.
So yeah, right now the Bruins are ahead of the Habs in the standings but pointing that out is like Demps crowing about defending a pass to Fitz while they are replaying him getting burned for a TD on the jumbotron.