rainman23 wrote:Again, I don't want any misunderstanding, just because one guy commented on my post without actually reading it (ironic, considering a couple comments I've made about people forming opinions about James without actually reading him). Anything I said about ideas not passing muster referred to the unenlightened pre-James era, when baseball was a quaint old game, and fans weren't expected to think much.
Please, stop with the presumptions. Not only did I read your post I read it several times over. You didn't take your time posting that. There are sentences in the post that are barely comprehensible. I did my best and I apologize for misunderstanding. If you want to debate my opinions, knock yourself out. That's why we're here. But there is no need for underhanded jabs simply because you took umbrage toward something I said or the manner in which it was written.