Fantasy Baseball Cafe Forums

by **dewey finn** » Thu Jun 22, 2006 8:23 am

TheYanks04 wrote:Can't deny his numbers his entire career.

Quoted For Tru.

by **chadlincoln** » Thu Jun 22, 2006 9:38 am

Can we merge this garbage beltre thread with the other garbage beltre thread?

by **acsguitar** » Thu Jun 22, 2006 11:51 am

Mr. Baseball wrote:he is worth having in my opinion so much upside

i don't think he has much upside. He hit 23 hr's one year and then 48 hr's and then back down to under 20.

Thats not upside thats a fluke

by **Dan Lambskin** » Thu Jun 22, 2006 1:21 pm

chadlincoln wrote:Can we merge this garbage beltre thread with the other garbage beltre thread?

...and then lock them :-D

by **dc928** » Thu Jun 22, 2006 1:25 pm

acsguitar wrote:
Mr. Baseball wrote:he is worth having in my opinion so much upside

i don't think he has much upside. He hit 23 hr's one year and then 48 hr's and then back down to under 20.

Thats not upside thats a fluke

Get to be the steriods, god am I glad Dodgers didn't sign him. I guess they somehow knew he is a bust.... :-t

by **dawgs2010** » Thu Jun 22, 2006 1:34 pm

acsguitar wrote:
TheYanks04 wrote:
Mr Irrelevant wrote:Just picked him up. Can't deny his numbers the past month.

Can't deny his numbers his entire career.

Yea seriously he sucked his whole career and has one steroid induced 48 home run contract year. He's worthless

How did steriods help him hit .334. On behalf of the Mariners I am offering him to any team willing to pay his contract. :-b

by **mdHARRIS** » Thu Jun 22, 2006 1:43 pm

I would assume being able to get the bat through the strike zone faster pretty much "slows" the ball down, thus being able to catch up to fastballs in general, or when waiting for a change-up, whatever...

by **tomdoyle3** » Thu Jun 22, 2006 1:54 pm

mdHARRIS wrote:I would assume being able to get the bat through the strike zone faster pretty much "slows" the ball down, thus being able to catch up to fastballs in general, or when waiting for a change-up, whatever...

And, he was able to hit the ball harder, which meant that he was able to find more holes and rack up the hits. ;-D

(I'm not saying he was on steroids, just giving another advantage that he had if he was on them.)

by **chadlincoln** » Thu Jun 22, 2006 1:57 pm

Dan Lambskin wrote:
chadlincoln wrote:Can we merge this garbage beltre thread with the other garbage beltre thread?

...and then lock them

by **dawgs2010** » Thu Jun 22, 2006 1:59 pm

I'm not saying that he was not on steriods, but there is no way that steriods alone turn you from a mediocre player to the MVP in one year :-?

.

Fantasy Baseball Cafe Forums

Hmmm... perhaps BELTRE is not thaaat bad?

Who is online