Return to Baseball Leftovers

WHIP: The most important pitching category.

Moderator: Baseball Moderators

Postby PlayingWithFire » Mon Jun 12, 2006 5:51 pm

J35J wrote:
PlayingWithFire wrote:
J35J wrote:
garf112 wrote:
Zito is God wrote:
garf112 wrote:
Zito is God wrote:The thing is, I agree that Ks are arguably the most solid stat because you are not giving the hitter even a chance to beat out a grounder or get a sac fly etc. However, there are many pitchers who simply are not K pitchers, yet do a solid job on the mound. This is where WHIP comes in. There are so many sinkerballer pitchers who just get infinite groundouts during their starts but have a low K ratio so they get passed by.


Doesn't this make gb/fb ratio the most important stat? Not WHIP

It actually could be debated that it is.


I think it is debatable, but you can have a very good ratio and still give up a ton of hits and runs being a sinkerballer. You don't HAVE to give up HRs to be a bad pitcher. GB/FB is a big reason I traded Vazques away (I am regretting it now because the guy I got for him...well, lets just say I REALLY needed a shortstop). Yet I will say again that WHIP means you aren't giving up the hits period, GB/FB could still have a high WHIP and is simply giving up a lot of grounders.


Basically to be a successful pitcher you need to do three things:

1) Strike people out
2) Keep people from hitting the ball in the air
3) Limit your walks

In that order. If you can do all three, you are an elite pitcher. If you break pitchers into categories, the best strike guys out and have a high gb%.... There are about 8 categories and the worst are flyball pitchers that don't strike anybody out.


WHIP has too much luck involved in it. Any pitcher will allow balls to fall in for hits at about a 30% rate.

If you are unable to find these stats, you might be better off just going with WHIP, but knowing that it is a flawed statistic.



I would have to disagree with the bolded. From the 3 you mentioned, here is how I would make the order of importance......

1. Limit your walks
2. Limit your walks
3. Strike people out
4. Keep people from hitting the ball in the air

Jason


is fb/gb ratio really that important? Jered Weaver is a fly ball pitcher and he's being successful.

really I think it's

1. Strike people out
2. Keep people from hitting the ball hard
3. Limit Walks(you can have success by nibbling and walk a few a game, see: Josh Johnson)



Hmmm, I'm really amazed that people don't realize that limiting walks is the most important thing a pitcher can do..... :-?

Jason


hmm, let's say if Jose Lima stopped walking people all of a sudden, will he be a cy young winner?

Striking people out shows that you have good stuff, so does keeping people from hitting the ball hard. Granted, you could be Ollie Perez but I'd rather have talent before anything else.
Are you interested in joining a 28 teams dynasty league? If so, PM me.
PlayingWithFire
Hall of Fame Hero
Hall of Fame Hero

User avatar
Cafe WriterLucky Ladders Weekly Winner
Posts: 13262
Joined: 7 Apr 2005
Home Cafe: Baseball
Location: Manhattan, KS

Postby J35J » Mon Jun 12, 2006 6:00 pm

PlayingWithFire wrote:
J35J wrote:
PlayingWithFire wrote:
J35J wrote:
garf112 wrote:
Zito is God wrote:
garf112 wrote:
Zito is God wrote:The thing is, I agree that Ks are arguably the most solid stat because you are not giving the hitter even a chance to beat out a grounder or get a sac fly etc. However, there are many pitchers who simply are not K pitchers, yet do a solid job on the mound. This is where WHIP comes in. There are so many sinkerballer pitchers who just get infinite groundouts during their starts but have a low K ratio so they get passed by.


Doesn't this make gb/fb ratio the most important stat? Not WHIP

It actually could be debated that it is.


I think it is debatable, but you can have a very good ratio and still give up a ton of hits and runs being a sinkerballer. You don't HAVE to give up HRs to be a bad pitcher. GB/FB is a big reason I traded Vazques away (I am regretting it now because the guy I got for him...well, lets just say I REALLY needed a shortstop). Yet I will say again that WHIP means you aren't giving up the hits period, GB/FB could still have a high WHIP and is simply giving up a lot of grounders.


Basically to be a successful pitcher you need to do three things:

1) Strike people out
2) Keep people from hitting the ball in the air
3) Limit your walks

In that order. If you can do all three, you are an elite pitcher. If you break pitchers into categories, the best strike guys out and have a high gb%.... There are about 8 categories and the worst are flyball pitchers that don't strike anybody out.


WHIP has too much luck involved in it. Any pitcher will allow balls to fall in for hits at about a 30% rate.

If you are unable to find these stats, you might be better off just going with WHIP, but knowing that it is a flawed statistic.



I would have to disagree with the bolded. From the 3 you mentioned, here is how I would make the order of importance......

1. Limit your walks
2. Limit your walks
3. Strike people out
4. Keep people from hitting the ball in the air

Jason


is fb/gb ratio really that important? Jered Weaver is a fly ball pitcher and he's being successful.

really I think it's

1. Strike people out
2. Keep people from hitting the ball hard
3. Limit Walks(you can have success by nibbling and walk a few a game, see: Josh Johnson)



Hmmm, I'm really amazed that people don't realize that limiting walks is the most important thing a pitcher can do..... :-?

Jason


hmm, let's say if Jose Lima stopped walking people all of a sudden, will he be a cy young winner?

Striking people out shows that you have good stuff, so does keeping people from hitting the ball hard. Granted, you could be Ollie Perez but I'd rather have talent before anything else.


8-o

I don't have time to get into this as I'm leaving from work but, wow.

Ollie P, Daniel, C. Denny B., S. Kazmir (before he could find the plate) ALL THE ROYALS pitching prospects. Just because you can strike a guy out means nothing if you can't find the plate. Not walking guys is A #1 of importance.

Sorry couldn't get into it more with you, gotta go. Maybe pick this back up tomorrow.......

later guys


Jason
J35J
Hall of Fame Hero
Hall of Fame Hero

User avatar
CafeholicFantasy ExpertCafe WriterCafe RankerMock(ing) DrafterPick 3 Weekly Winner
Posts: 10468
(Past Year: 49)
Joined: 26 Jan 2004
Home Cafe: Baseball

Postby J35J » Mon Jun 12, 2006 9:54 pm

Just to make a few points about the "limit the walks" vs "striking guys out" debate and then I will drop the topic as there really isn't an argument to be made but.....

How did the Unit turn his career around to become one of the greatest pitchers of all time?..... control (limiting walks) he went from 90-150 walks in a season to 40-70 during his prime years.

What is keeping Carlos Zambrano from being a top 5 pitcher? Control.... he consistantly walks 80+ guys a season.

Why is Brandon Webb so dominate now? He went from walking 119 guys a couple years ago to being on pace for just over 30 walks this year. 8-o

Mulder is declining pretty fast these last couple of years, well, he has put up 20-30 more walks in a season than when he was a pretty solid major league pitcher.

Why is Tony Armas having such a good start to the season? Well he was always on pace for 90+ walks in a season (alot of injuries) and now this season he is on pace for around 65ish.

Why do prospects get sent up and down from the minors or why do they struggle to even make it to the majors? Its because they need to limit there walks and harness there control, managers don't say...... well if Jim Bob could just strike out more guys he would be up here....... Its always, well if Jim Bob could find his control........


Anyway, I've babbled on too much. Control (limiting walks) is and always has been the most important thing for a pitcher to posses.

:-°
Jason
J35J
Hall of Fame Hero
Hall of Fame Hero

User avatar
CafeholicFantasy ExpertCafe WriterCafe RankerMock(ing) DrafterPick 3 Weekly Winner
Posts: 10468
(Past Year: 49)
Joined: 26 Jan 2004
Home Cafe: Baseball

Postby teddyballgamemvp » Tue Jun 13, 2006 9:25 am

OPS against is the best stat. MLB.com doesn't collect it, but you can piece it together since it gives the components.
teddyballgamemvp
Minor League Mentor
Minor League Mentor

User avatar

Posts: 801
Joined: 3 Mar 2006
Home Cafe: Baseball

Postby Dr. StrangeGlove » Tue Jun 13, 2006 11:19 am

Does anyone consider DIPS (Defence Independent) stats important in evaluating pitchers?
Dr. StrangeGlove
Minor League Mentor
Minor League Mentor


Posts: 876
Joined: 9 Nov 2005
Home Cafe: Baseball

Postby Trot Nixon » Tue Jun 13, 2006 12:30 pm

The_Met_Threat wrote:You can't just look at whip. I guess its better than looking at ERA and wins of course, and whip is a much better indicator of a pitchers skills than those two. But a pitcher can have a low whip but an inflated era pretty easily too. Look at Eric Milton for example, he has a 1.12 whip but a 4.10 era, its because he gives up so many HR. I think a combination of low whip/low hr, is a great analyzer of how a pitcher will do.
Exactly what I thought of when I read that, I mean WHIP is a great indicator but it doesn't tell the whole story.
Image
Thanks chipper!!!!

There is such a thing called clutch and David Ortiz is the modern day definition of it
Trot Nixon
General Manager
General Manager

User avatar

Posts: 2360
Joined: 10 Jan 2004
Home Cafe: Baseball
Location: Wishing Nixon would come back to the Sox

Postby laxguy8947 » Tue Jun 13, 2006 1:09 pm

Great debate guys ;-D Whip is nice (and it has a cool name) but I like K/BB myself. Strike em out and make them earn their way on at good rates and a pitcher is bound to have success
Image
Thanks to abrage22
laxguy8947
Minor League Mentor
Minor League Mentor

User avatar
Fantasy ExpertCafe Ranker
Posts: 918
Joined: 27 Dec 2005
Home Cafe: Baseball
Location: Cheering for the Braves in VA

Postby Zito is God » Tue Jun 13, 2006 3:05 pm

I can't believe there are still people out there who think walks are no big deal. Lets see, with a walk you are:

A) Tiring yourself out by throwing those 4+ pitches for nothing.
B) Getting a runner on base that could be a SB threat.
C) Getting a runner on base that is a scoring threat.
D) Getting a runner on base that makes you pitch out of the stretch instead of the wind up.
E) Getting a runner on base for free. PERIOD.

If you walk guys you will be giving up unecessary runs and tiring yourself out much faster.

THE most important thing is limiting walks showing good control. Guess what the first letter in WHIP stands for? :-)
Sean Tracey has my apologies, we all know Ozzie Guillen is an idiot. I'm rooting for you!
Zito is God
General Manager
General Manager

User avatar
Cafe WriterPick 3 Weekly Winner
Posts: 4169
Joined: 11 Mar 2004
Home Cafe: Baseball
Location: Secretly advising Cashman.

Postby Zito is God » Tue Jun 13, 2006 5:17 pm

garf112 wrote:
Zito is God wrote:I can't believe there are still people out there who think walks are no big deal. Lets see, with a walk you are:

A) Tiring yourself out by throwing those 4+ pitches for nothing.
B) Getting a runner on base that could be a SB threat.
C) Getting a runner on base that is a scoring threat.
D) Getting a runner on base that makes you pitch out of the stretch instead of the wind up.
E) Getting a runner on base for free. PERIOD.

If you walk guys you will be giving up unecessary runs and tiring yourself out much faster.

THE most important thing is limiting walks showing good control. Guess what the first letter in WHIP stands for? :-)


I never said that walks were "not a big deal." I said that they were the third most important trait for a pitcher to possess to be successful.

It is not even a question.

Ks
gb/fb
BBs

Walks are important. They just aren't the most important thing a pitcher can do. Now if a pitcher walks as many as Daniel Cabrera does, it makes him much less effective, but it also means that, if he can limit those walks, he has the ability to become a VERY good pitcher.


Your contradicting yourself. Just like J35J pointed out, by your logic O.Perez and D.cabrera should be winning Cy Youngs.

I'll take a pitcher who doesn't walk anyone and has good control over a pitcher with great stuff and high walks anyday.
Sean Tracey has my apologies, we all know Ozzie Guillen is an idiot. I'm rooting for you!
Zito is God
General Manager
General Manager

User avatar
Cafe WriterPick 3 Weekly Winner
Posts: 4169
Joined: 11 Mar 2004
Home Cafe: Baseball
Location: Secretly advising Cashman.

Postby DK » Tue Jun 13, 2006 6:33 pm

Limiting hits is much more important than limiting walks.

Think of it this way, would you rather have someone with a .000 batting average and a .300 on-base; or a .300 average and a .300 on-base?

You'd want the second player, because he's actually hitting the ball and has the ability to slug players ahead. Even if he's hitting solely singles, he's still creating more runs.

If you can limit both hits and walks, you're golden. But I'd rather a pitcher limit the hits given up than the walks any day.
DK
Hall of Fame Hero
Hall of Fame Hero

User avatar
CafeholicCafe WriterCafe RankerMock(ing) DrafterEagle Eye
Posts: 9533
Joined: 22 Mar 2003
Home Cafe: Baseball
Location: on deck

PreviousNext

Return to Baseball Leftovers

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests