An Iconic Fantasy Baseball Community
Moderator: Baseball Moderators
pilambp wrote:Trades should only be vetoed if it is suspected that collusion was involved.
great gretzky wrote:the integrity of the league argument is a touch flimsy IMO. Am jor part of the game is player evaluations and salesmanship. Every owner should be constantly looking fro ways he can improve hsi squad. Jsut because other woners didn;t think of it, doesn't mean it shouldn;t go through. Real sports don't have that itnegrity, neither should fantasy. Int he case of collusion, it is obvsiouly different. ut int he case of jsut lopsided trades, I don;t think the league has any business telling me or a trading partner how to run our teams.
sometimes the reasons for some of these trades aren;t as apprent fromt he surface as you might think. Everyone in my league was ina c ropw abotu a trade involving wakefield. well the guy getting him needed k's bad and overpaid for him. sometiomes someone is forced to play a counter intuitive strategy to make progress.
if things have to be too close, it isn;t fun and it seems more luck dependant. I think the economic subtext of the game is what really make sit fun IMO, ripping people off if possible is part of that.
Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 3 guests