Page 1 of 1

Miller or Redding

PostPosted: Sun Aug 03, 2003 11:33 pm
by Scoot
Both at home against the messy mets.

PostPosted: Sun Aug 03, 2003 11:38 pm
by jdh
I think that you should start both if you have them. Yes, it's possible for any pitcher to be off and get hurt by any team, but the Mets are now the NL version of the Tigers if no worse, and if you're not going to trust a pitcher against them, who will you trust him against?

PostPosted: Mon Aug 04, 2003 12:04 am
by Scoot
Here is the rest of guys....

Prior-@SD @LA
Smoltz-@MIL @STL
Webb @NYM
Washburn @CLE
Garland vs KC, OAK
Radke @DET

And then Redding and Miller. Start 5. W=10. SV=3.


As of now I have

Prior
Smoltz
Webb
Radke-actually pitching decent recently and very good matchup.
Miller

PostPosted: Mon Aug 04, 2003 1:23 am
by Madison
Scoot wrote:Here is the rest of guys....

Prior-@SD @LA
Smoltz-@MIL @STL
Webb @NYM
Washburn @CLE
Garland vs KC, OAK
Radke @DET

And then Redding and Miller. Start 5. W=10. SV=3.


As of now I have

Prior
Smoltz
Webb
Radke-actually pitching decent recently and very good matchup.
Miller


Not sure what the question is, but I'd start all those guys. None of the matchups look bad.

PostPosted: Mon Aug 04, 2003 3:13 pm
by pkarr5000
start both

PostPosted: Mon Aug 04, 2003 3:50 pm
by crazybob60
I would probably start both of them.
If you have to sit a guy, I would sit Radke as he hasn't done much this year, I think Redding's numbers versus NYM would match or outdo Radke's numbers versus DET.

PostPosted: Mon Aug 04, 2003 3:52 pm
by d
jdh wrote:I think that you should start both if you have them. Yes, it's possible for any pitcher to be off and get hurt by any team, but the Mets are now the NL version of the Tigers if no worse, and if you're not going to trust a pitcher against them, who will you trust him against?


agree with jdh :-)