TheYanks04 wrote:RugbyD wrote:kentx12 wrote:I dont like playing in a league where league votes. There are to many people who vote against a trade just to stop people from improving. In my leagues all trades are approved no matter how bad unless there is collusion involved.
this is how we do it unless someting looks really really bad, then we ask the teams to justify it. as long as something halfway reasonable is given, its good.
So then why bother at all? Either you are going to review based on some sort of equity guidelines or you should just let it all go through without review. Why waste the time is an ARod for Piazza deal is allowed based on a team need for a C for instance? The league moron should nt be allowed to disrupt the balance of power like that and I do not care if team needs justify it or not.
i don't believe in protecting idiots from themselves. I also don't believe in playing with GMs who will trade Arod for Piazza. Just b/c i don;t agree with the difference on opinion that generated a trade doesn't mean its no good. If teams justify an eyebrow-raiser trade with gibberish, then its enough reason to think something else may be going on.