Yahoo Player Rankings

[swyck]

I think its worthwhile.

The editing system sucks, but I I find It useful during the draft. I filter by position and immediately see who I have ranked that is not picked yet. I add my top remaining players to the queue.

I find crossing off drafted players from printouts to be tedious and a pain. There is no time for that during a draft.

[RynMan]

Waste of time in my opinion. There is no way you can rank from 1 to 200 the players you will want. You need to feel out how the draft is going and see what you need in terms of production at various positions. I would rather just construct a list of players at each position and go from there.

well, it's kind of a waste of time but if a squirrel blows your transformer or something, having a list can keep you from ending up w/ dudes that Yahoo mysteriously puts way higher than you would. It really doesn't take all that long w/ the interface as you just cruise down it and move the guys you want to change. It's also kind of handy to have at the draft as you just can follow down your adjusted list instead of the Yahoo list.

True, I'd just let the Yahoo pre-ranker handle any unforeseen circumstances (as bad an option as it is).

[AcidRock23]

And, one more thing to 'fiddle around with' is always fun until opening day...muwahahahahaha...