An Iconic Fantasy Baseball Community
Moderator: Baseball Moderators
StlSluggers wrote:Are you skeptical that the variance should be lower or higher?
Tavish wrote:StlSluggers wrote:Are you skeptical that the variance should be lower or higher?
It completely depends on how many teams there are in the league. A league with 10 teams the schedule's role is 40% (2 of 5 games). In a league with 20 teams the schedule's role is 20% (2 of 10 games). Again this isn't accounting for the chance of the highest scorer playing the lowest scorer.
I'm not skeptical about whether the variance is too high or too low, I'm skeptical that there is a decent way to define the study's results.
StlSluggers wrote:I guess to answer that I will have to explain how the whole thing works. It's not what you are thinking. You are looking at this problem with no data, or from a predictory standpoint. I am looking at it with data, or from a descriptive standpoint. I am not looking to say what could happen. I will be saying what did happen.
Tavish wrote:In every other situation it was your scheduling "luck" that allowed you to avoid playing the team which was the highest/lowest scoring team.
SaintsOfTheDiamond wrote:I'd love to help you out if I could, but I don't play H2H or points leagues. I'm still very interested in the results you come up with though if that gives you any motivation to keep at it.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests