
Most Accurate MLB Experts Past 4 Years
Moderator: Baseball Moderators
KolbSaves wrote:ERA isn't a bad tiebreaker because you can't win it just by spot starting 5 guys a day. Batting average (the second tiebreaker) is good for the same reason.
BritSox wrote:KolbSaves wrote:ERA isn't a bad tiebreaker because you can't win it just by spot starting 5 guys a day. Batting average (the second tiebreaker) is good for the same reason.
Why don't they just use a category that's not normally considered? Say, if it's 5-5, OPS becomes the deciding eleventh cat. Or losses? That would mitigate against the 'quantity' approach.
BritSox wrote:KolbSaves wrote:ERA isn't a bad tiebreaker because you can't win it just by spot starting 5 guys a day. Batting average (the second tiebreaker) is good for the same reason.
Why don't they just use a category that's not normally considered? Say, if it's 5-5, OPS becomes the deciding eleventh cat. Or losses? That would mitigate against the 'quantity' approach.
TDS-MN | ![]() |
KolbSaves wrote:BritSox wrote:KolbSaves wrote:ERA isn't a bad tiebreaker because you can't win it just by spot starting 5 guys a day. Batting average (the second tiebreaker) is good for the same reason.
Why don't they just use a category that's not normally considered? Say, if it's 5-5, OPS becomes the deciding eleventh cat. Or losses? That would mitigate against the 'quantity' approach.
A coinflip would be equally fair to determine who is better at things they didn't prepare for.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests