And I disagree, I don't think one or two dominant teams makes the divsion dominant, it just means that division had the most dominant teams. I also think that the 2005 NL east has better team overall than the AL east....the Drays, Orioles, and B-jays have zero pitching this season. Great hitting but zero pitching....there records would agree with me.
blankman wrote:ARod's never won a WS....what does that have to do with anything at all? A ton of guys have never won a WS. Heck Barry Bonds or Albert Pujols has never won one...does that mean anything to this debate?
Record-wise they may be the best, but they sure as hell aren't even close to the best division in history. And yes, I think the AL East is better as a division as well. They may be top-heavy, but you don't need a ton of depth to be better (example, the '01 D-Backs who rode just Randy and Curt). I'd rather have the best of the best than a bunch of better than average teams.