Most Accurate MLB Experts Past 4 Years
Moderator: Baseball Moderators
GotowarMissAgnes wrote:Too bad this list doesn't include a rookie OF who's posting an .885 OPS in one of the worst hitting parks known to man. He's far and away a better candidate than Ellison or Tavares.
GotowarMissAgnes wrote:He's on the rookie list at ESPN and BPro and was named "Rookie of the Month" in the NL for May.
Tavish wrote:GotowarMissAgnes wrote:He's on the rookie list at ESPN and BPro and was named "Rookie of the Month" in the NL for May.
Ahh I guess we were talking about different guys.![]()
The only problem I would have giving it to Church is that he has half the PA as Taveras and played in 30 less games.
GotowarMissAgnes wrote:Tavish wrote:GotowarMissAgnes wrote:He's on the rookie list at ESPN and BPro and was named "Rookie of the Month" in the NL for May.
Ahh I guess we were talking about different guys.![]()
The only problem I would have giving it to Church is that he has half the PA as Taveras and played in 30 less games.
So, Tavares wins because the Astros are stupid enough to play him all the time and bat him first?
I could see that if the two were anywhere close to each other in rate production, but Willie isn't within a country mile of Church. Assuming no injuries, Church will do far, far more in his 325 PAs than Willie will in his 600.
mweir145 wrote:These awards are mostly based on stats, so yes, the rookies with more playing time do have a better shot at the award than others who don't.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests