yankee_cafe wrote:Not vetoable ... but just plain stupid. The Figgins owners was getting shafted.
Figgins was just riding his bench most days because he has other players and plenty of steals already. Perhaps valuewise it was in my favor, but this trade would have improved his team.
Looks like another commish on power trip to me ...
That's exactly what I think. Now I'm especially angry because the commish seems to have convinced the guy I was trading with that I was trying to take advantage of him... man I'm steamed. Times like this I wish the angry smiley face actually worked.
I'll go with the always reliable
instead. And one of
for good measure.
Thanks for your opinions.