Pacman wrote:Nomar4prez wrote:Strasil42 wrote:thehat wrote:Way to go, George. Glad to see you're remaining in character. The season's less than two weeks old, but let's throw them under the bus anyway.
Obviously, I enjoy all bad things that may happen to the Yankees, but it's not just because I'm a Red Sox fan. I've always had an intense dislike for business owners who insist that all their employees be "clean cut" as though this makes a difference in how they perform. To me, it's an abhorrent policy, one that strikes at the heart of personal freedom and is an abuse of power that can only be rationalized by a control freak...which is the definition of Steinbrenner. Can't stand the guy, and that has nothing to do with the baseball team he owns.
But it helps.
dude its called being a professional....
Anyone else find that sentence extremely funny?
Oh nooooo... Look at the facts. No team full of characters with: full beards, goat-ees, 5 'o'clock shadows, 11 o'clock shadows, side burns, shoulder-length hair, dreadlocked hair, corn-rowed hair, and high-lighted hair... could EVER be successful. Right?
Next thing you're going to tell me a team could come back from an 0-3 deficit in a seven game series to WIN it.
wtf are you talking about. i never said a baseball team would suffer because they had long hair. Only that it looks bad upon the owner to have a bunch of guys who look like they are all drugged up.
just like a sox fan to just twist around words.