Hello everyone! I am in a 16 team Yahoo Rotisserie league. The categories are R, HR, RBI's, SB's, K's, Avg. -- W, L, SV, ERA, WHIP. and K's. The slots we have are C, 1B, 2B, SS, 3B, CI, MI, 3-OF, Util. -- 3SP, 2RP, 3P, a total of 4 bench spots and one DL. This will be my 4th year in the league with these guys and we have always set the max. games played to 162. We drafted just over a week ago and I just realized (today) that the commissioner switched the Max. games played on offense from 162 games (per position), from last year, to 156 without making a post (informing the league) about the change. I just assumed since nothing was mentioned that the settings would be the same. This starts all of our players out at +6. With my final 3 pics, I took the best overall available players, all of which are OF's, to store on my bench. Now, I have to switch at least one of them out for a CI or MI, and there isnt poop out there, because of this situation. I looked at the schedule and was planning on keeping all 3, barring injury, until I could naturally decide who to drop. Does anyone think the commissioner should have posted something to inform the league before the draft? I am sure there are a lot of teams in the league that still prob. dont know about this because I just stumbled across it. I have not made up my mind if I even like the idea of lowering the max. games played yet. I emailed the commish and havent heard back from him yet. I think the league was perfect the way it was, and if it aint broke, dont fix it. Could someone explain to me the implications this could have on my bench players and what I might do strategically different? Does anyone think this is a good idea? The league is tough enough as it is with all the teams and the extra CI, and MI slots. Also please note that I have 2 players from last season that played in all 162 games. The max. innings pitched is set at 1300, same as last year, and I dont have a prob. with that. Anyones thoughts on this would be appreciated.