It probably has something to do with ATL being very good at recognizing pitching talent. Not a huge Hudson fan, but if ATL wentout and got him, that boosts my opinion of him a bit.
Dmville wrote:It probably has something to do with ATL being very good at recognizing pitching talent. Not a huge Hudson fan, but if ATL wentout and got him, that boosts my opinion of him a bit.
That being said, I like Zam better.
I think Hudson will be great in ATL. That said, I'd still take Zambrano over him because of the better K rate.
Hudson is going to be ridiculously efficient, and I wouldn't be suprised if he ended up a Cy young contender. Just don't expect 200 k's.
So yeah, they're very close to each other in everything but K's. Hudson is more of a sure thing though, and Zam might start allowing HR's which Wrigley is notorious for. Other than that I see no reason that Zam shoudln't be taken before Hudson.
"Jack, will you call me, if you're able?"
"I've got your phone number written, in the back of my Bible."
You'll probably see his K rate drop, but everything else will improve, including his W's, the Bullpen in ATL is better than in Oakland. There are some dark horse guys in there for very solid years.
LBJackal wrote: and Zam might start allowing HR's which Wrigley is notorious for.
There's a reason he hasn't already, he won't. His pitching style prevents it. Nobody can lift that sinker into the stands and even his mistakes are difficult to sky. He gives up and equal number of HRs home and away.
Oakland has Dotel, Calero, Duke, and Bradford. Atlanta has Kolb. I think Oakland has the clear advantage in bullpen. Not that Hudson won't be great, but in Oakland is was more bad luck than anything for why he lost so many wins.
"Jack, will you call me, if you're able?"
"I've got your phone number written, in the back of my Bible."