by LBJackal » Thu Feb 10, 2005 8:00 pm
K-Rod, for a few reasons.
1. More of a history; he's been this good for 3 years, Lidge has been this good for 1 year.
2. Team; Lidge has no setup men, nobody to hold the lead til the 9th. K-Rod has Donnelly, Weber, and Shields.
3. Age; K-Rod has room for improvement IMO, whereas Lidge has already peaked. It's a minor thing, and probably doesn't factor into my decision much, if at all, but it's still there.
4. Overuse; Lidge has pitched in way too many games over the past 2 seasons. 130 G for K-Rod, 165 for Lidge. And with the bullpens the way they are , that trend will likely continue.
That's how I come to the conclusion of K-Rod over Lidge.
"Jack, will you call me, if you're able?"
"I've got your phone number written, in the back of my Bible."