Don't expect the whitesox to bat someone with a .300 OBP at the top of their lineup. Someone will realize this someway. Posednick will destroy your BA.
Crawford, Lee, Matsui,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Posednick.
Bud
Budworth22
College Coach
Posts: 143
Joined: 16 Dec 2003
Bases this season: 0
Home Cafe: Baseball
Location: Tallahassee/ Ft. Myers ST Home of the Sox and Twins
You can't compare Lee's and Matsuis 1st 2 seasons, the age difference was huge. Lee was 23-24, Matsui 29-30 (prime). Matsui's MLE's (Major League Equivalents) going off memory, was a 890 OPS, and 30 hrs. Looking at last year, it's pretty close (31 hrs), and a (912 Ops). I don't have Matsui's g/f ratios handy, but looking at his huge drop in dps from 03 to 04 (25 to 11), i'm guessing he lowered his g/f ratio, getting more balls airborne.
I'm wondering why someone thinks Lee (29), has the highest upside? Crawford at 23, imo, easily has the highest upside. Once Crawford drives the ball more, you could have a 25 hr 50 sb guy.
TROT Huff over Lee.
Smells Like Teen Spirit
HOOTIE
Hall of Fame Hero
Posts: 14815
(Past Year: 551)
Joined: 12 Jan 2003
Bases this season: 4,236
Home Cafe: Baseball
Location: Pearl Jam country, right next door to Nirvana, Soundgarden, and Alice in Chains.
Budworth22 wrote:Don't expect the whitesox to bat someone with a .300 OBP at the top of their lineup. Someone will realize this someway. Posednick will destroy your BA. Crawford, Lee, Matsui,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Posednick. Bud
HOOTIE wrote:You can't compare Lee's and Matsuis 1st 2 seasons, the age difference was huge. Lee was 23-24, Matsui 29-30 (prime). Matsui's MLE's (Major League Equivalents) going off memory, was a 890 OPS, and 30 hrs. Looking at last year, it's pretty close (31 hrs), and a (912 Ops).
Very true. However, since Matsui reached the Japanese major leagues at age 19 he has always been ahead of Lee in the development curve. Matsui had his breakout year at age 22 in 1996. In 130 games: