by Dawgpound 1613 » Wed Dec 15, 2004 8:29 am
Well, if the "30% of balls in play fall as hits" stuff is correct, and I think it is close, then strikeout pitchers will generally be better than non-strikeout pitchers. If your K/9 is 5 vs 8, that's an extra hit, on average. When that bloop hit comes with two outs and the bases loaded, there's two runs. There's a reason high strikeout pitchers are generally your doiminant pitchers.
And to TownDrunk, again, Schmidt is good, Williams and Foppert are talented, but coming off injury. I have Foppert on my sleeper list, so I hope you are right that he becomes the 5th starter and that he's 100%. That said, they are not sure things right now.
As for Tomko, we'll have to disagree. I saw Loaiza in 2003, and he looked great as well. There was something different about him from what he had shown before that. Yet, in 2004, he was back to "normal". Was 2003 a fluke or not? Based on last year, I'll say fluke. As with Tomko, until he does more than pitch well in one half, I'm not ready to proclaim that he's turned the corner.