Cornbread Maxwell wrote:Both will have 2B/SS eligibility in Yahoo, but for me I cant see taking Cintron ahead of Infante.
Why would you take Cintron ahead of Infante? They should put up similar stats across the board except in SBs and Infante should have about 10-15 more in that cat. Obviously Cintron is the more recognized name, so thats why I'll be spending less on Infante and getting a better player than the more expensive Cintron.
I can see if you think Cintron will hit over .300 again, but other than that, he has to change that trend of a decreasing BB/K - it almost doubled in 2004.
Infante is the better value. You can write this off as a Homer statement or not, but dont say you werent warned.
that's a true tiger fan
but...he's right IMO. infante's 2004 was just as good as cintron's 2003. infante's 2004 was better than cintron's 2004. why not go with the guy with better numbers? i actually don't remember seeing them playing, but looking at the numbers, i'd go with infante, plus he's 3 years younger than cintron.