I agree also although I am worried that he won't get those 10 or so SBs in Oakland.
Maine has a good swing for a pitcher but on anything that moves, he has no chance. And if it's a fastball, it has to be up in the zone. Basically, the pitcher has to hit his bat. - Mike Pelfrey
Curious as to why Hatteberg isn't put back behind the dish. He was a catcher for the Red Sox before going to Oakland. Was there a reason they took him from behind the plate?
Fire-Rescue-Diver wrote:Curious as to why Hatteberg isn't put back behind the dish. He was a catcher for the Red Sox before going to Oakland. Was there a reason they took him from behind the plate?
He had an arm injury that limited him as a catcher.
Maine has a good swing for a pitcher but on anything that moves, he has no chance. And if it's a fastball, it has to be up in the zone. Basically, the pitcher has to hit his bat. - Mike Pelfrey
Amazinz wrote:I agree also although I am worried that he won't get those 10 or so SBs in Oakland.
Let's assume that he hits 1 or 2 in that lineup. Could we check how hitters in those spots have performed SB wise over the last 6 or 7 years? I think that those who had the ability to steal bases Jere,y Giambi excluded, stole their fair share. Could we run a check?
Forget the man crush. I drop what I'm doing to watch Zack Greinke pitch.
perlick29
General Manager
Posts: 4810
(Past Year: 1)
Joined: 10 Mar 2004
Bases this season: 11
Home Cafe: Baseball
Location: praising the almighty Baseball Prospectus
What I am worried about is that his SB% went down the toilet last year. So does Oakland let him run? As for checking we could do that if we knew who batted 1-2 for Oakland the last 6 years. I'm not sure where to find old lineups but maybe someone could help out there.
Maine has a good swing for a pitcher but on anything that moves, he has no chance. And if it's a fastball, it has to be up in the zone. Basically, the pitcher has to hit his bat. - Mike Pelfrey
Amazinz wrote:What I am worried about is that his SB% went down the toilet last year. So does Oakland let him run? As for checking we could do that if we knew who batted 1-2 for Oakland the last 6 years. I'm not sure where to find old lineups but maybe someone could help out there.
11/19 is not much different from 8/15 and 15/23 the previous two years. I definitely think he gets his 10-15 if he gets 550 AB's.
Though I like the expression down the toilet, it doesnt really apply here. To paraphrase a wise Mets man, "your argument went down the toilet."
Forget the man crush. I drop what I'm doing to watch Zack Greinke pitch.
perlick29
General Manager
Posts: 4810
(Past Year: 1)
Joined: 10 Mar 2004
Bases this season: 11
Home Cafe: Baseball
Location: praising the almighty Baseball Prospectus
Stealing below 60% I don't think he'll get many chances to steal, especially if he's at the top of their lineup. He'll have his usual good BA and score a bunch of runs though.
"Jack, will you call me, if you're able?"
"I've got your phone number written, in the back of my Bible."
If the likes of Eric Chavez and Miguel Tejada can get double digits or close to it in Oakland, I don't think double digits for Kendall is out of the question.
Amazinz wrote:What I am worried about is that his SB% went down the toilet last year. So does Oakland let him run? As for checking we could do that if we knew who batted 1-2 for Oakland the last 6 years. I'm not sure where to find old lineups but maybe someone could help out there.
11/19 is not much different from 8/15 and 15/23 the previous two years. I definitely think he gets his 10-15 if he gets 550 AB's.
Though I like the expression down the toilet, it doesnt really apply here. To paraphrase a wise Mets man, "your argument went down the toilet."
I'll admit I didn't realize his SB% has been this bad since 2000 but let me rephrase this: With an SB% that bad do you think Oakland will let him steal?
I agree with Jackal and that was mainly what I was getting at.
Maine has a good swing for a pitcher but on anything that moves, he has no chance. And if it's a fastball, it has to be up in the zone. Basically, the pitcher has to hit his bat. - Mike Pelfrey