StlSluggers wrote:This just in. The Taser Co. has announced it will be marketing its new Taser product, "Toddler Taser". They hope to get it out in time for Christmas.
stomperrob wrote:Couldn't they just jump him and subdue him - I mean really, the risk to the officers from a 6 year old with a piece of glass was minimal.
They didn't do it to protect themselves. They did it to protect the kid from inflicting any more harm to himself.
StlSluggers wrote:I go away to the restroom for a couple of minutes, and I come back to 14,829 "Reply to topic" e-mails in my Inbox. Of course, I immediately knew that Hurricane Madison had just ripped through the boards again.
You really should turn those notifications off.
I could have some real fun.
Yes doctor, I am sick. Sick of those who are spineless. Sick of those who feel self-entitled. Sick of those who are hypocrites. Yes doctor, an army is forming. Yes doctor, there will be a war. Yes doctor, there will be blood.....
StlSluggers wrote:I go away to the restroom for a couple of minutes, and I come back to 14,829 "Reply to topic" e-mails in my Inbox. Of course, I immediately knew that Hurricane Madison had just ripped through the boards again.
You really should turn those notifications off.
I could have some real fun.
It only sends one per thread unless I visit it, you know? You'd have to visit every unique thread that I've posted to if you wanted to give me any problems.
Of course, this would be a great way for you to post another 26,000 real quick, huh?
stomperrob wrote:Couldn't they just jump him and subdue him - I mean really, the risk to the officers from a 6 year old with a piece of glass was minimal.
They didn't do it to protect themselves. They did it to protect the kid from inflicting any more harm to himself.
I know but if you can get close enough to zap him, you're close enough to grab him instead so why the need?????
Still holds the MLB record for Grand Slams with 23
stomperrob wrote:Couldn't they just jump him and subdue him - I mean really, the risk to the officers from a 6 year old with a piece of glass was minimal.
They didn't do it to protect themselves. They did it to protect the kid from inflicting any more harm to himself.
I know but if you can get close enough to zap him, you're close enough to grab him instead so why the need?????
That is actually a good point. I hope that they really had fear or they have some explaining to do.
Cafe Home
Fantasy Football
Fantasy Basketball
Fantasy Hockey
by acsguitar » Fri Nov 12, 2004 6:19 pm 
